In the 13th round of the Chinese Super League, Guoan lost 0-1 to SIPG. The referee's penalty in the match caused controversy after the match. On September 26, on the Beijing Winter Olympics documentary channel "Night of the Chinese Super League", commentator Wang Su reviewed the game and bluntly said that it felt bad, like the feeling of "anti-gambling and sweeping the black" ten years ago. Repeated disputes and penalties are not a matter of business ability.
在中国超级联赛的第13轮中，国安以0-1输给SIPG。比赛中裁判的判罚引起比赛争议。 9月26日，在北京冬季奥运会的纪录片频道“中国超级联赛之夜”上，评论员王苏评论了比赛，并直言不讳地感觉很糟糕，就像十年前的“反赌博和席卷黑人”的感觉一样。 。反复发生的争执和处罚与业务能力无关。
After the show started, Wang Su first said that the game was very exciting and intense, but the referee’s penalty had to be mentioned, “Many people say, why do we love hypocrisy, why can’t the pattern be higher, why we have to entangle in the details, but my The point of view is that we must dig deeper in such details. This season we have experienced a lot of weird penalties. Even so, we experienced an unforgettable night last night. For this game, some people should take a closer look at what is behind the scenes. What kind of power and what kind of story can bring such a game."
After reviewing the controversial judgments on the court, Wang Su said bluntly: "The Guoan team's enthusiasm for playing football is gone, and it will vent when you are angry. If you really want to blow it like this, how can you play. It's like the 04 strike. When we shouted, we also lose if we kick, and we lose if we don’t. The so-called technical and tactical data comparison is meaningless."
Subsequently, Wang Su linked the game to the “anti-gambling and anti-crime” campaign ten years ago. “I don’t know what the storm of ten years ago brought to everyone’s memory, leaving it to the Chinese football team to summarize and learn the lessons. Years ago, it was forgotten by many people selectively. Judging from some small details and clues, although it did not reach that intensity, this game gave us a bad feeling, like it felt ten years ago, but we don’t have any evidence. , But we must remind the Chinese Football Association and relevant referee management departments that in this special season, referee problems have repeatedly appeared, and such problems have appeared in Golden Whistle."
随后，王苏将该游戏与十年前的“反赌博和反犯罪”运动联系起来。 “我不知道十年前的这场风暴给所有人留下了深刻的印象，而是让中国足球队总结和学习了这些教训。几年前，许多人有选择地忘记了它。从一些小的细节和线索来看，虽然它没有达到那种强度，但是这款游戏给了我们一种十年前的感觉，但是我们没有任何证据。 ，但是我们必须提醒中国足协和相关的裁判管理部门，在这个特殊的季节，裁判问题屡次出现，而这种问题在金哨中也已经出现。”
In the end, Wang Su bluntly said that these incredible penalties are not a problem of professional ability. "The referee management department of the Chinese Football Association cannot be without problems, otherwise there will be no such disputes over and over again. The explanation cannot be convinced, why is this?"